🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.